2026 -- S 2421

========

LC004483

========

     STATE OF RHODE ISLAND

IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY

JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2026

____________

A N   A C T

RELATING TO TOWNS AND CITIES -- LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING

     Introduced By: Senator David P. Tikoian

     Date Introduced: January 30, 2026

     Referred To: Senate Housing & Municipal Government

     (by request)

It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows:

     SECTION 1. Section 45-53-4 of the General Laws in Chapter 45-53 entitled "Low and

Moderate Income Housing" is hereby amended to read as follows:

     45-53-4. Procedure for approval of construction of low- or moderate-income housing.

[Effective January 1, 2026, inclusive of existing language in § 45-53-4.]

     (a) Any applicant proposing to build low- or moderate-income housing may submit to the

local review board a single application for a comprehensive permit to build that housing in lieu of

separate applications to the applicable local boards.

     (1) This procedure is only available for proposals in which at least twenty-five percent

(25%) of the housing is low- or moderate-income housing. This procedure is not available in cities

and towns that have low- or moderate-income housing in excess of ten percent (10%) of its year-

round housing units which also have an inclusionary zoning ordinance which complies with § 45-

24-46.1.

     (2) This procedure is not available in cities and towns that do not have low- or moderate-

income housing in excess of ten percent (10%) of its year-round housing units, but have an

inclusionary zoning ordinance which complies with § 45-24-46.1 and requires that all housing

developments include at least fifty percent (50%) low- or moderate-income housing units.

     (b) Cities and towns that have low- or moderate-income housing in excess of ten percent

(10%) of its year-round housing units:

     (1) May provide an applicant with more dwelling units than allowed by right under its

zoning ordinance in the form of a density bonus to allow an increase in the allowed dwelling units

per acre (DU/A), as well as other incentives and municipal government subsidies as defined in §

45-53-3;

     (2) May, by council action, limit the annual total number of dwelling units in

comprehensive permit applications from for-profit developers to an aggregate of one percent (1%)

of the total number of year-round housing units in the town, and notwithstanding the timetables set

forth elsewhere in this section, the local review board shall have the authority to consider

comprehensive permit applications from for-profit developers, which are made pursuant to this

subsection, sequentially in the order in which they are submitted.

     (c) Cities and towns that do not have low- or moderate-income housing in excess of ten

percent (10%) of its year-round housing units:

     (1) Shall make available to applications under this chapter municipal government

subsidies, including adjustments and zoning incentives, to offset the differential costs of the low-

or moderate-incoming housing units. At a minimum, the following zoning incentives shall be

allowed for in these cities or towns for projects submitted under this chapter:

     (A) Density bonuses. These cities and towns shall provide an applicant with more dwelling

units than allowed by right under its zoning ordinances in the form of a density bonus to allow an

increase in the allowed dwelling units per acre (DU/A). At a minimum, the following density

bonuses for projects submitted under this chapter, provided that the total land utilized in the density

calculation shall exclude wetlands; area devoted to roadway infrastructure necessary for

development; and easements or rights of way of record:

     (i) For properties connected to public sewer and water, or eligible to be connected to public

sewer and water based on written confirmation from each respective service provider, the density

bonus for a project that provides at least twenty-five percent (25%) low- and moderate-income

housing shall be at least five (5) units per acre;

     (ii) For properties connected to public sewer and water, or eligible to be connected to public

sewer and water based on written confirmation from each respective service provider, the density

bonus for a project that provides at least fifty percent (50%) low- and moderate-income housing

shall be at least nine (9) units per acre;

     (iii) For properties connected to public sewer and water, or eligible to be connected to

public sewer and water based on written confirmation from each respective service provider, the

density bonus for a project that provides one hundred percent (100%) low- and moderate-income

housing shall be at least twelve (12) units per acre;

     (iv) For properties not connected to either public water or sewer or both, but which provide

LC004483 - Page 2 of 14

competent evidence as to the availability of water to service the development and/or a permit for

on-site wastewater treatment facilities to service the dwelling units from the applicable state

agency, the density bonus for a project that provides at least twenty-five percent (25%) low- and

moderate-income housing shall be at least three (3) units per acre;

     (v) For properties not connected to either public water or sewer or both, but which provide

competent evidence as to the availability of water to service the development and/or a permit for

on-site wastewater treatment facilities to service the dwelling units from the applicable state

agency, the density bonus for a project that provides at least fifty percent (50%) low- and moderate-

income housing shall be at least five (5) units per acre;

     (vi) For properties not connected to either public water or sewer or both, but which provide

competent evidence as to the availability of water to service the development and/or a permit for

on-site wastewater treatment facilities to service the dwelling units from the applicable state

agency, the density bonus for a project that provides one hundred percent (100%) low- and

moderate-income housing shall be at least eight (8) units per acre;

     (B) Parking. A municipality shall not require more than one off-street parking space per

dwelling unit for units up to and including two (2) bedrooms in applications submitted under this

chapter;

     (C) Bedrooms. A municipality shall not limit the number of bedrooms for applications

submitted under this chapter to anything less than three (3) bedrooms per dwelling unit for single-

family dwelling units;

     (D) Floor area. A municipality shall not utilize floor area requirements to limit any

application, except as provided by § 45-24.3-11.

     (d) A municipality shall not restrict comprehensive permit applications and permits by any

locally adopted ordinance or policy that places a limit or moratorium on the development of

residential units.

     (e) The application and review process for a comprehensive permit shall be as follows:

     (1) Pre-application conference. A municipality may require an applicant proposing a

project under this chapter, who is not electing to have master plan review, to complete, or the

applicant proposing a project under this chapter may request a pre-application conference with the

local review board, the technical review committee established pursuant to § 45-23-56, or with the

administrative officer for the local review board as appropriate. In advance of a pre-application

conference, the applicant shall be required to submit only a short description of the project in

writing including the number of units, type of housing, density analysis, preliminary list of

adjustments needed, as well as a location map, and conceptual site plan. The purpose of the pre-

LC004483 - Page 3 of 14

application conference shall be to review a concept plan of the proposed development and to elicit

feedback from the reviewing person or board. Upon receipt of a request by an applicant for a pre-

application conference, the municipality shall have thirty (30) days to schedule and hold the pre-

application conference, unless a different timeframe is agreed to by the applicant in writing. If thirty

(30) days has elapsed from the filing of the pre-application submission and no pre-application

conference has taken place, nothing shall be deemed to preclude an applicant from thereafter filing

and proceeding with an application for preliminary plan review for a comprehensive permit.

     (2) Optional master plan. An applicant may elect to apply for and be heard on master plan

review prior to preliminary plan submission. If a master plan review is elected by the applicant the

following shall apply:

     (i) Submission requirements. Submission requirements for master plan review shall be

limited to the following:

     (A) An application form and fee;

     (B) A short description of the project in writing including the number of units, type of

housing, density analysis, list of adjustments needed, as well as a location map, and preliminary

determinations as to site constraints;

     (C) Conceptual site plans showing infrastructure locations for roadways, preliminary

locations and design of conceptual stormwater facilities, location of sewer and water lines and/or

wells and on-site wastewater treatment systems, locations of housing units, estimated locations of

site constraints and wetlands;

     (D) A preliminary traffic opinion for projects of over thirty (30) dwelling units;

     (E) A letter of eligibility issued by the Rhode Island housing and mortgage finance

corporation, or in the case of projects primarily funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and

Urban Development or other state or federal agencies, an award letter indicating the subsidy, or

application in such form as may be prescribed for a municipal government subsidy;

     (F) If the applicant submits any requests for adjustments at master plan, a public hearing

shall be held in the same manner as during preliminary plan review as set forth in this section and

the applicant shall be responsible for providing the list of abutters and all advertising costs.

     (ii) Certification of completeness. The master plan application must be certified complete

or incomplete by the administrative officer according to the provisions of § 45-23-36; provided,

however, that the certificate shall be granted within twenty-five (25) days of submission of the

application. The running of the time period set forth herein will be deemed stopped upon the

issuance of a written certificate of incompleteness of the application by the administrative officer

and will recommence upon the resubmission of a corrected application by the applicant. However,

LC004483 - Page 4 of 14

in no event will the administrative officer be required to certify a corrected submission as complete

or incomplete less than ten (10) days after its resubmission. If the administrative officer certifies

the application as incomplete, the officer shall set forth in writing with specificity the missing or

incomplete items.

     (iii) Review of applications. A master plan application filed in accordance with this chapter

shall be reviewed in accordance with the following provisions:

     (A) Timeframe for review. The local review board shall render a decision on the master

plan application within sixty (60) days of the date the application is certified complete, or within a

further amount of time that may be consented to by the applicant through the submission of a

written consent.

     (B) Failure to act. Failure of the local review board to act within the prescribed period

constitutes approval of the master plan, and a certificate of the administrative officer as to the failure

of the local review board to act within the required time and the resulting approval shall be issued

on request of the applicant.

     (C) Required findings. In voting on an application, the local review board shall make

findings, supported by legally competent evidence on the record that discloses the nature and

character of the observations upon which the fact finders acted, on the standards required for

preliminary plan review in this section, to the extent applicable at the master plan. The failure to

provide information which is required later at preliminary plan review shall not form a basis for

denial. If the board votes to defer a finding to preliminary plan it shall do so on the record during

the proceedings and in the written decision and specify what items are necessary for review at the

preliminary plan stage in order to address that finding.

     (iv) Vesting. The approved master plan is vested for a period of two (2) years with the

right to extend for two (2), one-year extensions upon written request by the applicant, who must

appear before the planning board for each annual review. Thereafter, vesting may be extended for

a longer period, for good cause shown, if requested, in writing by the applicant, and approved by

the local review board. The vesting for the master plan approval includes all ordinance provisions

and regulations at the time of the approval, general and specific conditions shown on the approved

master plan drawings and supporting material.

     (3) Preliminary plan review.

     (i) Submission requirements. Applications for preliminary plan review under this chapter

shall include:

     (A) Unless already submitted at a master plan stage, a letter of eligibility issued by the

Rhode Island housing and mortgage finance corporation, or in the case of projects primarily funded

LC004483 - Page 5 of 14

by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or other state or federal agencies, an

award letter indicating the subsidy, or application in such form as may be prescribed for a municipal

government subsidy; and

     (B) A letter signed by the authorized representative of the applicant, setting forth the

specific sections and provisions of applicable local ordinances and regulations from which the

applicant is seeking adjustments; and

     (C) A proposed timetable for the commencement of construction and completion of the

project; and

     (D) Those items required by local regulations promulgated pursuant to applicable state law,

with the exception of evidence of state or federal permits; and for comprehensive permit

applications included in the checklist for the preliminary plan review in the local regulations

promulgated pursuant to chapter 23 of this title; and

     (E) Notwithstanding the submission requirements set forth above, the local review board

may request additional, reasonable documentation throughout the public hearing, including, but not

limited to, opinions of experts, credible evidence of application for necessary federal and/or state

permits, statements and advice from other local boards and officials.

     (ii) Certification of completeness. The preliminary plan application must be certified

complete or incomplete by the administrative officer according to the provisions of § 45-23-36;

provided, however, that the certificate shall be granted within twenty-five (25) days of submission

of the application. The running of the time period set forth herein will be deemed stopped upon the

issuance of a written certificate of incompleteness of the application by the administrative officer

and will recommence upon the resubmission of a corrected application by the applicant. However,

in no event will the administrative officer be required to certify a corrected submission as complete

or incomplete less than ten (10) days after its resubmission. If the administrative officer certifies

the application as incomplete, the officer shall set forth in writing with specificity the missing or

incomplete items.

     (iii) Review of applications. An application filed in accordance with this chapter shall be

reviewed in accordance with the following provisions:

     (A) Public hearing. A public hearing shall be noticed and held as soon as practicable after

the issuance of a certificate of completeness.

     (B) Notice. Public notice for the public hearing will be the same notice required under local

regulations for a public hearing for a preliminary plan promulgated in accordance with § 45-23-42.

The cost of notice shall be paid by the applicant.

     (C) Timeframe for review. The local review board shall render a decision on the

LC004483 - Page 6 of 14

preliminary plan application within ninety (90) days of the date the application is certified

complete, or within a further amount of time that may be consented to by the applicant through the

submission of a written consent.

     (D) Failure to act. Failure of the local review board to act within the prescribed period

constitutes approval of the preliminary plan, and a certificate of the administrative officer as to the

failure of the local review board to act within the required time and the resulting approval shall be

issued on request of the applicant. Further, if the public hearing is not convened or a decision is not

rendered within the time allowed in subsections (e)(3)(iii)(A) and (e)(3)(iii)(C) of this section, the

application is deemed to have been allowed and the preliminary plan approval shall be issued

immediately.

     (E) Required findings. In voting on an application, the local review board shall make

findings, supported by legally competent evidence on the record that discloses the nature and

character of the observations upon which the fact finders acted, on each of the following standards,

where applicable:

     (I) Whether the proposed development is consistent with local needs as identified in the

community’s affordable housing plan and/or has satisfactorily addressed the issues where there

may be inconsistencies. If the local board finds that the proposed development is inconsistent with

the community’s affordable housing plan, it must also find that the municipality has made

significant progress in implementing its housing plan.

     (II) Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the standards and provisions

of the municipality’s zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations, and/or where adjustments are

requested by the applicant, whether local concerns that have been affected by the relief granted do

not outweigh the state and local need for low- and moderate-income housing. For cities and towns

that have low- or moderate-income housing in excess of ten percent (10%) of its year-round housing

units, where adjustments are requested, in addition to the above-showing, the proposed

development must show it has mitigated any impact of the proposed development on the general

character of the surrounding area.

     (III) Whether the low- and moderate-income housing units proposed are integrated

throughout the development; are compatible in scale, meaning that: (1) The size of the low- and

moderate-income units shall not be less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the size of the market

rate units, unless otherwise allowed by the local board; (2) The affordable units are of similar

architectural style to the market rate units within the project so that the exterior of the units look

like an integrated neighborhood with similar rooflines, window patterns, materials and colors; and

(3) The affordable units will be built and occupied in a proportional manner with the construction

LC004483 - Page 7 of 14

and occupancy of the market rate units. Except that for housing units that are intended to be

occupied by persons fifty-five (55) years of age or older, or sixty-two (62) years of age or older, as

permitted by the federal Fair Housing Act pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3607(b) and 24 C.F.R. §§

100.300-308 and the Rhode Island fair housing practices act pursuant to § 34-37-4.1, such units

need not be integrated in any building or phase within the development that contains housing units

that are not age-restricted, and neither age-restricted housing units nor any building or phase

containing age-restricted housing units must be compatible in scale and architectural style to other

housing unit types to the extent the age-restricted housing units are designed to meet the physical

or social needs of older persons or necessary to provide housing opportunities for older persons.

     (IV) Whether there will be significant negative impacts on the health and safety of current

or future residents of the community, in areas including, but not limited to, safe circulation of

pedestrian and vehicular traffic, provision of emergency services, sewerage disposal, availability

of potable water, adequate surface water run-off, and the preservation of natural, historical, or

cultural features.

     (V) Whether the proposed land developments or subdivisions lots will have adequate and

permanent physical access to a public street in accordance with the requirements of § 45-23-

60(a)(5), or the local review board has approved other access, such as a private road.

     (VI) Whether the proposed development will result in the creation of individual lots with

any physical constraints to development that building on those lots according to pertinent

regulations and building standards would be impracticable, unless created only as permanent open

space or permanently reserved for a public purpose on the approved, recorded plans.

     (F) [Deleted by P.L. 2025, ch. 363, § 1 and P.L. 2025, ch. 364, § 1.]

     (iv) Vesting. The approved preliminary plan is vested for a period of two (2) years with the

right to extend for two (2), one-year extensions upon written request by the applicant, who must

appear before the planning board for each annual review and provide proof of valid state or federal

permits as applicable. Thereafter, vesting may be extended for a longer period, for good cause

shown, if requested, in writing by the applicant, and approved by the local review board. The

vesting for the preliminary plan approval includes all ordinance provisions and regulations at the

time of the approval, general and specific conditions shown on the approved preliminary plan

drawings and supporting material.

     (4) Final plan review. The second and final stage of review for the comprehensive permit

project shall be done administratively, unless an applicant has requested and been granted any

waivers from the submission of checklist items for preliminary plan review, and then, at the local

review board’s discretion, it may vote to require the applicant to return for final plan review and

LC004483 - Page 8 of 14

approval.

     (i) Submission requirements. Applications for final plan review under this chapter shall

include:

     (A) All required state and federal permits must be obtained prior to the final plan approval

or the issuance of a building permit; and

     (B) A draft monitoring agreement which identifies an approved entity that will monitor the

long-term affordability of the low- and moderate-income units pursuant to § 45-53-3.2; and

     (C) A sample land lease or deed restriction with affordability liens that will restrict use as

low- and moderate-income housing in conformance with the guidelines of the agency providing

the subsidy for the low- and moderate-income housing, but for a period of not less than thirty (30)

years; and

     (D) Those items required by local regulations promulgated pursuant to applicable state law

included in the checklist for final plan review in the local regulations promulgated pursuant to

chapter 23 of this title, including, but not limited to:

     (I) Arrangements for completion of the required public improvements, including

construction schedule and/or financial guarantees; and

     (II) Certification by the tax collector that all property taxes are current; and

     (III) For phased projects, the final plan for phases following the first phase, shall be

accompanied by copies of as-built drawings not previously submitted of all existing public

improvements for prior phases.

     (ii) Certification of completeness. The final plan application must be certified complete or

incomplete by the administrative officer according to the provisions of § 45-23-36; provided

however, that the certificate shall be granted within twenty-five (25) days of submission of the

application. The running of the time period set forth herein will be deemed stopped upon the

issuance of a written certificate of incompleteness of the application by the administrative officer

and will recommence upon the resubmission of a corrected application by the applicant. However,

in no event will the administrative officer be required to certify a corrected submission as complete

or incomplete less than ten (10) days after its resubmission. If the administrative officer certifies

the application as incomplete, the officer shall set forth in writing with specificity the missing or

incomplete items.

     (iii) Review of applications.

     (A) Timeframe for review. The reviewing authority shall render a decision on the final plan

application within forty-five (45) days of the date the application is certified complete.

     (B) Modifications and changes to plans:

LC004483 - Page 9 of 14

     (I) Minor changes, as defined in the local regulations, to the approved plans may be

approved administratively, by the administrative officer. The changes may be authorized without

additional public hearings, at the discretion of the administrative officer. All changes shall be made

part of the permanent record of the project application. This provision does not prohibit the

administrative officer from requesting a recommendation from either the technical review

committee or the local review board. Denial of the proposed change(s) shall be referred to the local

review board for review as a major change.

     (II) Major changes, as defined in the local regulations, to the plans may be approved only

by the local review board and must follow the same review and public hearing process required for

approval of preliminary plans as described in subsection (e)(3)(iii) of this section.

     (III) The administrative officer shall notify the applicant in writing within fourteen (14)

days of submission of the final plan application if the administrative officer is referring the

application to the local review board under this subsection.

     (C) Decision on final plan. An application filed in accordance with this chapter shall be

approved by the administrative officer unless such application does not satisfy conditions set forth

in the preliminary plan approval decision or such application does not have the requisite state and/or

federal approvals or other required submissions, does not post the required improvement bonds, or

such application is a major modification of the plans approved at preliminary plan.

     (D) Failure to act. Failure of the reviewing authority to act within the prescribed period

constitutes approval of the final plan, and a certificate of the administrative officer as to the failure

to act within the required time and the resulting approval shall be issued on request of the applicant.

     (iv) Vesting. The approved final plan decision is vested for a period of two (2) years with

the right to extend for one one-year extension upon written request by the applicant, who must

appear before the planning board for the extension request, unless, within that period, the plat or

plan has been submitted for signature and recording as specified in § 45-23-64. Thereafter, vesting

may be extended for a longer period, for good cause shown, if requested, in writing by the applicant,

and approved by the local review board.

     (5) Infeasibility of conditions of approval. The burden is on the applicant to show, by

competent evidence before the local review board, that proposed conditions of approval are

infeasible, as defined in § 45-53-3. Upon request, the applicant shall be provided a reasonable

opportunity to respond to such proposed conditions prior to a final vote on the application.

     (6) Fees. Municipalities may impose fees on comprehensive permit applications that are

consistent with but do not exceed fees that would otherwise be assessed for a project of the same

scope and type, but not proceeding under this chapter; provided, however, the imposition of such

LC004483 - Page 10 of 14

fees shall not preclude a showing by an applicant that the fees make the project financially

infeasible.

     (7) Recording of written decisions. All written decisions on applications under this chapter

shall be recorded in the land evidence records within twenty (20) days after the local review board’s

vote or the administrative officer’s decision, as applicable. A copy of the recorded decision shall

be mailed within one business day of recording, by any method that provides confirmation of

receipt, to the applicant and to any objector who has filed a written request for notice with the

administrative officer.

     (8) Local review board powers. The local review board has the same power to issue permits

or approvals that any local board or official who would otherwise act with respect to the application,

including, but not limited to, the power to attach to the permit or approval, conditions, and

requirements with respect to height, site plan, size or shape, or building materials, as are consistent

with the terms of this section.

     (9) Majority vote required. All local review board decisions on comprehensive permits

shall be by majority vote of the members present at the proceeding.

     (10) Construction timetable. A comprehensive permit shall expire unless construction is

started within twelve (12) months and completed within sixty (60) months of the recording of the

final plan unless a longer and/or phased period for development is agreed to by the local review

board and the applicant. Low- and moderate-income housing units shall be built and occupied prior

to, or simultaneous with the construction and occupancy of market rate units.

     (11) [Deleted by P.L. 2025, ch. 363, § 2 and P.L. 2025, ch. 364, § 2.]

     (12) Report. The local review board of a town with an approved affordable housing plan

shall report the status of implementation to the housing resources commission, including the

disposition of any applications made under the plan, as of June 30, 2006, by September 1, 2006,

and for each June 30 thereafter by September 1 through 2010. The housing resources commission

shall prepare by October 15 and adopt by December 31, a report on the status of implementation,

which shall be submitted to the governor, the speaker and the president of the senate, and shall find

which towns are not in compliance with implementation requirements.

     (13) Remanded applications. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 45-53-4 in effect on

February 13, 2004, a local review board shall commence hearings within thirty (30) days of

receiving an application remanded pursuant to § 45-53-5 or, effective January 1, 2024, § 45-53-

5.1. In any town with more than one remanded application, applications may be scheduled for

hearing in the order in which they were received, and may be taken up sequentially, with the thirty-

day (30) requirement for the initiation of hearings, commencing upon the decision of the earlier

LC004483 - Page 11 of 14

filed application.

     (f)(1) The general assembly finds and declares that in January 2004 towns throughout

Rhode Island have been confronted by an unprecedented volume and complexity of development

applications as a result of private for-profit developers using the provisions of this chapter and that

in order to protect the public health and welfare in communities and to provide sufficient time to

establish a reasonable and orderly process for the consideration of applications made under the

provisions of this chapter, and to have communities prepare plans to meet low- and moderate-

income housing goals, that it is necessary to impose a moratorium on the use of comprehensive

permit applications as herein provided by private for-profit developers; a moratorium is hereby

imposed on the use of the provisions of this chapter by private for-profit developers, which

moratorium shall be effective on passage and shall expire on January 31, 2005, and may be revisited

prior to expiration and extended to such other date as may be established by law. Notwithstanding

the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, private for-profit developers may not utilize the

procedure of this chapter until the expiration of the moratorium.

     (2) No for-profit developer shall submit a new application for comprehensive permits until

July 1, 2005, except by mutual agreement with the local review board.

     (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (f)(2) of this section, a local review board

in a town which has submitted a plan in accordance with subsection (g) of this section, shall not be

required to accept an application for a new comprehensive permit from a for-profit developer until

October 1, 2005.

     (g) Towns and cities that are not in conformity with the provisions of § 45-53-3(5)(i) shall

prepare by December 31, 2004, a comprehensive plan housing element for low- and moderate-

income housing as specified by § 45-53-3(5)(ii), consistent with applicable law and regulation.

That the secretary of the planning board or commission of each city or town subject to the

requirements of this paragraph shall report in writing the status of the preparation of the housing

element for low- and moderate-income housing on or before June 30, 2004, and on or before

December 31, 2004, to the secretary of the state planning council, to the chair of the house

committee on corporations and to the chair of the senate committee on commerce, housing and

municipal government.

     (h) If any provision of this section or the application thereof shall for any reason be judged

invalid, the judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder of this section or of any

other provision of this chapter, but shall be confined in its effect to the provision or application

directly involved in the controversy giving rise to the judgment, and a moratorium on the

applications of for-profit developers pursuant to this chapter shall remain and continue to be in

LC004483 - Page 12 of 14

effect for the period commencing on the day this section becomes law [February 13, 2004] and

continue until it shall expire on January 31, 2005, or until amended further.

     (i) In planning for, awarding, and otherwise administering programs and funds for housing

and for community development, state departments, agencies, boards and commissions, and public

corporations, as defined in chapter 18 of title 35, shall among the towns subject to the provision of

§ 45-53-3(5)(ii), give priority to the maximum extent allowable by law to towns with an approved

affordable housing plan. The director of administration shall adopt not later than January 31, 2005,

regulations to implement the provisions of this section.

     (j) Multi-family rental units built under a comprehensive permit may be calculated towards

meeting the requirements of a municipality’s low- or moderate-income housing inventory, as long

as the units meet and are in compliance with the provisions of § 45-53-3.1.

     SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.

========

LC004483

========

LC004483 - Page 13 of 14

EXPLANATION

BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL

OF

A N   A C T

RELATING TO TOWNS AND CITIES -- LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING

***

     This act would prohibit a contractor’s submission of a single application to the local review

board for a comprehensive permit to build low- or moderate- income housing in cities or towns that

have an inclusionary zoning ordinance in compliance with § 45-24-46.1 and requires that all

housing developments include at least fifty percent (50%) low- or moderate- income housing units.

     This act would take effect upon passage.

========

LC004483

========

LC004483 - Page 14 of 14