2024 -- S 2888 | |
======== | |
LC005742 | |
======== | |
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND | |
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY | |
JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2024 | |
____________ | |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO COMMERCIAL LAW -- GENERAL REGULATORY PROVISIONS -- | |
AUTOMATED DECISION TOOLS | |
| |
Introduced By: Senators DiPalma, Gu, Picard, Gallo, Lawson, and Bissaillon | |
Date Introduced: March 22, 2024 | |
Referred To: Senate Judiciary | |
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows: | |
1 | SECTION 1. Title 6 of the General Laws entitled "COMMERCIAL LAW — GENERAL |
2 | REGULATORY PROVISIONS" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following chapter: |
3 | CHAPTER 60 |
4 | AUTOMATED DECISION TOOLS. |
5 | 6-60-1. Short title. |
6 | This chapter shall be known and may be cited as "Automated Decision Tools". |
7 | 6-60-2. Legislative purpose. |
8 | It is the purpose of this chapter to require companies that develop or deploy high-risk |
9 | artificial intelligence (AI) systems to conduct impact assessments and adopt risk management |
10 | programs. |
11 | 6-60-3. Definitions. |
12 | As used in this chapter, the following words and terms shall have the following meanings: |
13 | (1) "Consequential decision" means a determination made by a deployer that has a legal or |
14 | similarly significant effect on an individual. |
15 | (2) "Legal or similarly significant effect" means a decision that determines an individual's |
16 | eligibility for and results in the provision or denial of housing, employment, credit, education, |
17 | access to physical places of public accommodation, healthcare, or insurance. |
18 | (3) "Consequential artificial intelligence decision system (CAIDS)" means machine-based |
| |
1 | systems or services that utilize machine learning, artificial intelligence, or similar techniques that |
2 | provide outputs that are not predetermined, and have been specifically developed, or an AI system |
3 | specifically modified, with the intended purpose of making or determining consequential decisions. |
4 | (4) "Developers" means any entity that designs, codes, or produces a CAIDS, or modifies |
5 | an AI system with the intended purpose of making a consequential decision, whether for internal |
6 | use or for use by third parties. |
7 | (5) "Deployers" means any entity that uses a CAIDS to make consequential decisions. |
8 | 6-60-4. Deployer impact assessment requirement. |
9 | (a) A deployer shall: |
10 | (1) Implement and maintain a risk management program that establishes the policies, |
11 | processes, and personnel that will be used to identify, mitigate, and document risks arising from |
12 | the deployment of a CAIDS; and |
13 | (2) Take into consideration, in implementing the risk management program: |
14 | (i) The deployer's size and complexity; |
15 | (ii) The nature and scope of the CAIDS, including its intended use; |
16 | (iii) The sensitivity and volume of data processed in connection with the CAIDS; and |
17 | (iv) Cost of implementation and maintenance of the risk management system. |
18 | (b) A deployer shall perform an impact assessment prior to deploying a CAIDS and |
19 | annually thereafter. If the deployer makes material changes to the purpose for which a CAIDS is |
20 | used or the type of data it receives, a new impact assessment shall be conducted. |
21 | (c) In performing an impact assessment, deployers shall maintain documentation for a |
22 | reasonable time period in light of the intended use regarding: |
23 | (1) The purpose of the CAIDS and its intended use cases, deployment context, and benefits; |
24 | (2) The extent to which the use of the CAIDS once it is deployed is consistent with or |
25 | varies from the developer's description of intended uses; |
26 | (3) The potential for denials of housing, employment, credit, education, access to physical |
27 | places of public accommodation, healthcare, or insurance resulting from use of the CAIDS to |
28 | disproportionately impact people on the basis of protected characteristics, to the extent feasible, |
29 | and the steps taken to mitigate the risk of such harm occurring; |
30 | (4) A description of data that will be processed as inputs by the CAIDS once deployed and |
31 | a description of the outputs produced by the CAIDS; |
32 | (5) If applicable, an overview of the type of data the deployer used to retrain the CAIDS; |
33 | (6) If applicable, metrics for evaluating the CAIDS's performance and known limitations; |
34 | (7) If applicable, transparency measures, including information identifying to individuals |
| LC005742 - Page 2 of 5 |
1 | when a CAIDS is in use; and |
2 | (8) If applicable, post-deployment monitoring and user safeguards, including a description |
3 | of the oversight process in place to address issues as they arise. |
4 | 6-60-5. Developer obligations. |
5 | (a) A developer shall provide the deployer with the technical capability to access or |
6 | otherwise make available to a deployer the information reasonably necessary for the deployer to |
7 | comply with its requirement to perform an impact assessment, including documentation regarding |
8 | a CAIDS's capabilities, known limitations, and guidelines for intended use. Nothing in this chapter |
9 | shall require the disclosure of trade secrets or other confidential information. |
10 | (b)(1) A developer shall implement and maintain a risk management program that |
11 | establishes the policies, processes, training procedures, and personnel that will be used to identify, |
12 | mitigate, and document risks arising from the development of a CAIDS, including conducting a |
13 | design evaluation pursuant to subsection (c) of this section. |
14 | (2) In implementing the risk management program, a developer shall take the following |
15 | into consideration: |
16 | (i) Its size and complexity; |
17 | (ii) The nature and scope of the CAIDS, including its intended end use; |
18 | (iii) The sensitivity and volume of data used to train the CAIDS; and |
19 | (iv) Cost of implementation and maintenance of the risk management system. |
20 | (c)(1) A developer shall conduct a design evaluation for a CAIDS. The design evaluation |
21 | shall consider information relevant to the potential for unlawful bias in connection with the |
22 | intended end use of the CAIDS. |
23 | (2) Developers shall, as appropriate given their role in the development of the CAIDS, |
24 | maintain documentation for a reasonable time period in light of the intended use regarding: |
25 | (i) The purpose of the CAIDS and its intended end use cases, features, and benefits; |
26 | (ii) The potential for denials of housing, employment, credit, education, access to physical |
27 | places of public accommodation, healthcare, or insurance resulting from use of the CAIDS to |
28 | disproportionately impact people on the basis of protected characteristics, to the extent feasible, |
29 | and the steps taken to mitigate the risk of such harm occurring; |
30 | (iii) Known limitations of the CAIDS, including factors affecting performance; |
31 | (iv) An overview of the type of data used to train the CAIDS and how the data was collected |
32 | and processed; and |
33 | (v) Metrics for how the CAIDS's performance was evaluated prior to sale. |
34 | 6-60-6. Enforcement. |
| LC005742 - Page 3 of 5 |
1 | (a) Developers and deployers shall publicly self-certify that they are in compliance with |
2 | their obligations under this chapter. Developers and deployers may use an impact assessment or |
3 | design evaluation conducted in accordance with other laws or regulations if such assessment or |
4 | evaluation is reasonably similar in scope. |
5 | (b) The attorney general may issue a subpoena in the course of an investigation that requires |
6 | the deployer or developer to disclose to the attorney general the contents of a relevant impact |
7 | assessment or design evaluation, subject to § 6-60-4(a). |
8 | (c) Impact assessments and design evaluations shall be confidential and exempt from |
9 | public inspection and copying under chapter 2 of title 38 ("public records"). The disclosure of an |
10 | impact assessment or design evaluation pursuant to a request from the attorney general shall not |
11 | constitute a waiver of attorney-client privilege or work product protection with respect to the |
12 | assessment or evaluation and any information contained therein. |
13 | SECTION 2. This act shall take effect on January 1, 2026. |
======== | |
LC005742 | |
======== | |
| LC005742 - Page 4 of 5 |
EXPLANATION | |
BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL | |
OF | |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO COMMERCIAL LAW -- GENERAL REGULATORY PROVISIONS -- | |
AUTOMATED DECISION TOOLS | |
*** | |
1 | This act would require companies that develop or deploy high-risk AI systems to conduct |
2 | impact assessments and adopt risk management programs, would apply to both developers and |
3 | deployers of AI systems and would require obligations of these different types of companies based |
4 | on their role in the AI ecosystem. |
5 | This act would also require deployers of high-risk AI systems to perform an impact |
6 | assessment prior to deploying an AI system and annually thereafter. If the deployer makes material |
7 | changes to the purpose for which an AI system is used or the type of data it receives, a new impact |
8 | assessment will be conducted. In performing an impact assessment, deployers of high-risk AI |
9 | systems shall maintain documentation for a reasonable time period in light of the intended use. |
10 | This act would further require developers of high-risk AI systems to make available to a |
11 | deployer the information reasonably necessary for the deployer to comply with its requirement to |
12 | perform an impact assessment, including documentation regarding an AI system's capabilities, |
13 | known limitations, and guidelines for intended use. |
14 | This act would also require developers and deployers to implement a risk management |
15 | program that establishes the policies, processes, and personnel that will be used to identify, |
16 | mitigate, and document risks arising from the AI system. |
17 | Lastly, this act would require companies to self-certify that they have satisfied the impact |
18 | assessment obligations and implemented risk management programs. The attorney general could |
19 | subpoena the impact assessments in the course of an investigation. |
20 | This act would take effect on January 1, 2026. |
======== | |
LC005742 | |
======== | |
| LC005742 - Page 5 of 5 |