2021 -- S 0870  | |
========  | |
LC002799  | |
========  | |
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND  | |
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY  | |
JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2021  | |
____________  | |
A N A C T  | |
RELATING TO INSURANCE -- UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT  | |
  | |
Introduced By: Senator Maryellen Goodwin  | |
Date Introduced: May 04, 2021  | |
Referred To: Senate Judiciary  | |
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows:  | |
1  | SECTION 1. Section 27-9.1-4 of the General Laws in Chapter 27-9.1 entitled "Unfair  | 
2  | Claims Settlement Practices Act" is hereby amended to read as follows:  | 
3  | 27-9.1-4. "Unfair claims practices" defined.  | 
4  | (a) Any of the following acts by an insurer, if committed in violation of § 27-9.1-3,  | 
5  | constitutes an unfair claims practice:  | 
6  | (1) Misrepresenting to claimants and insured relevant facts or policy provisions relating to  | 
7  | coverage at issue;  | 
8  | (2) Failing to acknowledge and act with reasonable promptness upon pertinent  | 
9  | communications with respect to claims arising under its policies;  | 
10  | (3) Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation and  | 
11  | settlement of claims arising under its policies;  | 
12  | (4) Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlement of  | 
13  | claims submitted in which liability has become reasonably clear;  | 
14  | (5) Compelling insured, beneficiaries, or claimants to institute suits to recover amounts due  | 
15  | under its policies by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in suits  | 
16  | brought by them;  | 
17  | (6) Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation;  | 
18  | (7) Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after having  | 
19  | completed its investigation related to the claim or claims;  | 
  | |
1  | (8) Attempting to settle or settling claims for less than the amount that a reasonable person  | 
2  | would believe the insured or beneficiary was entitled by reference to written or printed advertising  | 
3  | material accompanying or made part of an application;  | 
4  | (9) Attempting to settle or settling claims on the basis of an application that was materially  | 
5  | altered without notice to, or knowledge or consent of, the insured;  | 
6  | (10) Making claims payments to an insured or beneficiary without indicating the coverage  | 
7  | under which each payment is being made;  | 
8  | (11) Unreasonably delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring both a  | 
9  | formal proof of loss form and subsequent verification that would result in duplication of  | 
10  | information and verification appearing in the formal proof of loss form;  | 
11  | (12) Failing in the case of claims denials or offers of compromise settlement to promptly  | 
12  | provide a reasonable and accurate explanation of the basis of those actions;  | 
13  | (13) Failing to provide forms necessary to present claims within ten (10) calendar days of  | 
14  | a request with reasonable explanations regarding their use;  | 
15  | (14) Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards to assure that the repairs of a  | 
16  | repairer owned by or required to be used by the insurer are performed in a workmanlike manner;  | 
17  | (15) Misleading a claimant as to the applicable statute of limitations;  | 
18  | (16) Failing to respond to a claim within thirty (30) days, unless the insured shall agree to  | 
19  | a longer period;  | 
20  | (17) Engaging in any act or practice of intimidation, coercion, threat, or misrepresentation  | 
21  | of consumers rights, for or against any insured person, claimant, or entity to use a particular rental  | 
22  | car company for motor vehicle replacement services or products; provided, however, nothing shall  | 
23  | prohibit any insurance company, agent, or adjuster from providing to such insured person, claimant,  | 
24  | or entity the names of a rental car company with which arrangements have been made with respect  | 
25  | to motor vehicle replacement services; provided, that the rental car company is licensed pursuant  | 
26  | to § 31-5-33;  | 
27  | (18) Refusing to honor a "direction to pay" executed by an insured, claimant, indicating  | 
28  | that the insured or claimant wishes to have the insurance company directly pay his or her motor  | 
29  | vehicle replacement vehicle rental benefit to the rental car company of the consumer's choice;  | 
30  | provided, that the rental car company is licensed pursuant to § 31-5-33. Nothing in this section shall  | 
31  | be construed to prevent the insurance company's ability to question or challenge the amount  | 
32  | charged, in accordance with its policy provisions, and the requirements of the department of  | 
33  | business regulation;  | 
34  | (19) Modifying any published manual, i.e., Motor's Auto Repair Manual, Mitchells, or any  | 
  | LC002799 - Page 2 of 6  | 
1  | automated appraisal system, relating to auto body repair without prior agreement between the  | 
2  | parties;  | 
3  | (20) Failing to use a manual or system in its entirety in the appraisal of a motor vehicle;  | 
4  | (21) Refusing to compensate an auto body shop for their documented charges as identified  | 
5  | through the most current version of automotive industry-recognized software programs or systems  | 
6  | for paint, body and refinishing materials in auto body repair claims, including, but not limited to,  | 
7  | programs such as Mitchell's RMC, PMC Logic, Paint, Micromix, or a paint manufacturer's  | 
8  | programs. An insurer shall not discount documented charges by failing to use a system in its  | 
9  | entirety, including an automotive industry standard markup;  | 
10  | (22) Failing to comply with the requirements of § 31-47-12.1;  | 
11  | (23) Failure to have an appraisal performed by a licensed appraiser where the motor vehicle  | 
12  | has sustained damage estimated to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500). The licensed  | 
13  | appraiser referred to herein must be unaffiliated with the repair facility repairing the subject motor  | 
14  | vehicle; must perform a physical inspection of the damaged motor vehicle; and may not perform  | 
15  | an appraisal based upon pictures of the damaged motor vehicle;  | 
16  | (24) Failure to perform an initial appraisal within three (3) business days after a request is  | 
17  | received from an auto body repair shop, provided the damaged motor vehicle is on the premises of  | 
18  | the repair shop when the request is made, and failure to perform a supplemental appraisal inspection  | 
19  | of a vehicle within four (4) business days after a request is received from an auto body repair shop.  | 
20  | The time limitations set forth in this subsection may be extended by mutual agreement between the  | 
21  | auto body repair shop and the insurer;  | 
22  | (25) Designating a motor vehicle a total loss if the cost to rebuild or reconstruct the motor  | 
23  | vehicle to its pre-accident condition is less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the "fair market  | 
24  | value" of the motor vehicle immediately preceding the time it was damaged:  | 
25  | (i) For the purposes of this subdivision, "fair market value" means the retail value of a  | 
26  | motor vehicle as set forth in a current edition of a nationally recognized compilation of retail values  | 
27  | commonly used by the automotive industry to establish values of motor vehicles;  | 
28  | (ii) Nothing herein shall be construed to require a vehicle be deemed a total loss if the total  | 
29  | cost to rebuild or reconstruct the motor vehicle to its pre-accident condition is greater than seventy-  | 
30  | five percent (75%) of the fair market value of the motor vehicle immediately preceding the time it  | 
31  | was damaged;  | 
32  | (iii) Nothing herein shall prohibit an insurance company from agreeing to deem a vehicle  | 
33  | a total loss at the vehicle owner's request and with the vehicle owner's express written authorization  | 
34  | if the cost to rebuild or reconstruct the motor vehicle to its pre-accident condition is less than  | 
  | LC002799 - Page 3 of 6  | 
1  | seventy-five percent (75%) of the "fair market value" of the motor vehicle immediately preceding  | 
2  | the time it was damaged;  | 
3  | (iv) If condition adjustments are made to the retail value of a motor vehicle designated a  | 
4  | total loss, all such adjustments must be in accordance with the standards set forth in the current  | 
5  | edition of a nationally recognized compilation of retail values, commonly used by the automotive  | 
6  | industry, used by the insurer to determine the retail value of the vehicle; and all such adjustments,  | 
7  | including prior damage deductions, must be itemized, fair, and reasonable; and  | 
8  | (v) When a vehicle is deemed a total loss, if the insurer is not retaining the salvage, the  | 
9  | insurer must notify the owner of the vehicle in writing of the requirements of obtaining both a  | 
10  | salvage title and a reconstructed title from the department of motor vehicles pursuant to chapter 1  | 
11  | of title 31, and must obtain, in writing, the owner's consent and acknowledgement that the insurer  | 
12  | is not retaining the salvage and include a statement of the owner's obligation and potential costs to  | 
13  | dispose of or otherwise retain the salvage;  | 
14  | (26) Negotiating, or effecting the settlement of, a claim for loss or damage covered by an  | 
15  | insurance contract with an unlicensed public adjuster acting on behalf of an insured. Nothing  | 
16  | contained in this section shall be construed to preclude an insurer from dealing with any individual  | 
17  | or entity that is not required to be licensed under chapter 10 of title 27.  | 
18  | (b)(1) Nothing contained in subsections (a)(19), (a)(20), and (a)(21) of this section shall be  | 
19  | construed to interfere with an auto body repair facility's contract with an insurance company.  | 
20  | (2) If an insurance company and auto body repair facility have contracted under a direct  | 
21  | repair program or any similar program thereto, the provisions of subsections (a)(19), (a)(20), and  | 
22  | (a)(21) of this section shall not apply.  | 
23  | (3) If the insured or claimant elects to have the vehicle repaired at a shop of his or her  | 
24  | choice, the insurer shall not limit or discount the reasonable repair costs based upon the charges  | 
25  | that would have been incurred had the vehicle been repaired by the insurer's chosen shop(s).  | 
26  | (27) Refusing to pay an auto body repair shop for documented necessary sublet services  | 
27  | paid out to vendors or incurred by the auto body repair shop, for specialty or unique services  | 
28  | performed in the overall repair process, including costs and labor incurred to research, coordinate,  | 
29  | administrate or facilitate the necessary sublet service, and an automotive industry standard markup.  | 
30  | Examples of sublet services include, but are not limited to, towing, transportation, suspension,  | 
31  | alignments, electronic calibrations, diagnostic work, mechanical work, and paid charges to release  | 
32  | a vehicle.  | 
  | LC002799 - Page 4 of 6  | 
1  | SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.  | 
========  | |
LC002799  | |
========  | |
  | LC002799 - Page 5 of 6  | 
EXPLANATION  | |
BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL  | |
OF  | |
A N A C T  | |
RELATING TO INSURANCE -- UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT  | |
***  | |
1  | This act would make changes to the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act.  | 
2  | This act would take effect upon passage.  | 
========  | |
LC002799  | |
========  | |
  | LC002799 - Page 6 of 6  |