|
2013 -- H 5742 | |
|
======= | |
|
LC01323 | |
|
======= | |
|
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND | |
|
| |
|
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY | |
|
| |
|
JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2013 | |
|
| |
|
____________ | |
|
| |
|
A N A C T | |
|
RELATING TO TAXATION -- TAX EXPENDITURE EVALUATION ACT | |
|
|
      |
|
|
      |
|
     Introduced By: Representatives Tanzi, Walsh, O`Grady, Valencia, and Ferri | |
|
     Date Introduced: February 28, 2013 | |
|
     Referred To: House Finance | |
|
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows: | |
|
1-1 |
     SECTION 1. Title 44 of the General Laws entitled "TAXATION" is hereby amended by |
|
1-2 |
adding thereto the following chapter: |
|
1-3 |
     CHAPTER 48.2 |
|
1-4 |
TAX EXPENDITURE EVALUATION ACT |
|
1-5 |
     44-48.2-1. Findings and purpose. -- The legislature finds that existing law allows for a |
|
1-6 |
variety of provisions, known as tax expenditures, that reduce taxpayer liability in order to pursue |
|
1-7 |
a broad range of policy objectives. |
|
1-8 |
     The legislature further finds that these tax expenditures result in a significant amount of |
|
1-9 |
foregone tax revenue for this state, and that tax expenditures are a major part of the government's |
|
1-10 |
involvement in a large number of policy areas. |
|
1-11 |
     The legislature further finds that the state lacks a systematic approach for identifying the |
|
1-12 |
purposes of tax expenditures, rigorously evaluating whether those purposes are being fulfilled in a |
|
1-13 |
cost-effective manner, and ensuring that impartial evaluations are given sufficient attention |
|
1-14 |
during the budget and policymaking processes. |
|
1-15 |
     Therefore, in order to evaluate and improve the government's effectiveness in serving the |
|
1-16 |
citizens of this state, the legislature finds it necessary to provide for the systematic and |
|
1-17 |
comprehensive analysis of tax expenditures by analysts, economists, and other professionals, and |
|
1-18 |
for those analyses to be incorporated into the budget and policymaking processes via the use of |
|
1-19 |
sunset provisions and other means. |
|
2-20 |
     44-48.2-2. Definitions. -- As used in this chapter: |
|
2-21 |
     (1) "Evaluation body" means the office of revenue analysis. |
|
2-22 |
     (2) "Tax expenditure" means any law of the federal government or this state that exempts, |
|
2-23 |
in whole or in part, certain persons, businesses, income, goods, services, or property from the |
|
2-24 |
impact of established taxes in this state, including, but not limited to, tax exclusions, tax |
|
2-25 |
subtractions, tax exemptions, tax deductions, preferential tax rates, tax credits, and tax deferrals. |
|
2-26 |
The term "tax expenditure" also refers to exclusion or exemption of services from the sales tax. |
|
2-27 |
     44-48.2-3. Sunsets and statement of purpose. -- Notwithstanding any statute or law to |
|
2-28 |
the contrary, any act enacted after July 1, 2013, that would create a tax expenditure, renew an |
|
2-29 |
existing tax expenditure, or modify an existing tax expenditure shall contain an expiration date of |
|
2-30 |
not longer than seven (7) years from the effective date of the new, renewed, or modified tax |
|
2-31 |
expenditure. Such acts shall also contain a statement of intent that clearly provides the purpose |
|
2-32 |
and objectives of the tax expenditure, including measurable goals in cases where the objectives of |
|
2-33 |
the tax expenditure lend themselves to measurement. Any act that is enacted without the |
|
2-34 |
provisions required by this section shall not take effect. |
|
2-35 |
     44-48.2-4. Analysis of tax expenditures. -- (a) If the revenue loss associated with a tax |
|
2-36 |
expenditure exceeds five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) in fiscal year 2013 or a succeeding |
|
2-37 |
fiscal year, the office of revenue analysis, with the cooperation of the division of taxation, office |
|
2-38 |
of management and budget (OMB), shall analyze the use of the tax expenditure on the following |
|
2-39 |
schedule to determine to what extent the statute authorizing the tax expenditure has achieved any |
|
2-40 |
or all of the purposes identified under subsection (b) of this section: |
|
2-41 |
     (1) Analyses of tax expenditures existing on July 1, 2013, shall be completed and |
|
2-42 |
released under subsection (h) of this section at least once between July 1, 2013 and June 30, 2020, |
|
2-43 |
and no less than once every seven (7) years thereafter; |
|
2-44 |
     (2) Analyses of any tax expenditure created after July 1, 2013, shall be completed and |
|
2-45 |
released under subsection (h) of this section within seven (7) years of taking effect, and no less |
|
2-46 |
than once every seven (7) years thereafter; |
|
2-47 |
     (3) Analyses of any tax expenditure with a termination date provided for by law shall be |
|
2-48 |
completed and released under subsection (h) of this section between eighteen (18) and thirty-six |
|
2-49 |
(36) months before the effective date of termination; |
|
2-50 |
     (4) Analyses of tax expenditures with similar purposes or objectives shall be scheduled to |
|
2-51 |
occur concurrently or in succession, to the extent that doing so does not conflict with the |
|
2-52 |
scheduling restrictions outlined under subdivisions (1) through (3) of this section. |
|
2-53 |
     (b) The analyses under subsection (a) of this section shall, at a minimum, report the |
|
2-54 |
following information to the extent that the office of revenue analysis is able to obtain that |
|
3-1 |
information on its own or with the cooperation of the division of taxation and other government |
|
3-2 |
entities under subsection (g) of this section, and to the extent that reporting such information does |
|
3-3 |
not constitute a breach of this state's taxpayer confidentiality laws: |
|
3-4 |
     (1) The statutory authority for the tax expenditure; |
|
3-5 |
     (2) The year in which the tax expenditure was enacted; |
|
3-6 |
     (3) The statement of purpose of the tax expenditure, if one was included in legislation; |
|
3-7 |
     (4) The likely purpose or purposes of the tax expenditure, based on legislative history and |
|
3-8 |
other sources, if the statement of purpose in legislation was absent or vague; |
|
3-9 |
     (5) A description of the tax expenditure; |
|
3-10 |
     (6) The state revenue foregone directly as a result of the tax expenditure in the prior fiscal |
|
3-11 |
year, as well as estimates of the state revenue that will be foregone in the current and subsequent |
|
3-12 |
fiscal years; |
|
3-13 |
     (7) The local revenue foregone, if any, directly as a result of the tax expenditure in the |
|
3-14 |
prior fiscal year, as well as estimates of the local revenue that will be foregone in the current and |
|
3-15 |
subsequent fiscal years; |
|
3-16 |
     (8) The total number of taxpayers who directly benefitted from the tax expenditure in the |
|
3-17 |
prior fiscal year; |
|
3-18 |
     (9) The classes of individuals, types of organizations, or types of industries whose state |
|
3-19 |
tax liabilities are directly affected by the tax expenditure; |
|
3-20 |
     (10) The distribution of the direct benefits of the tax expenditure by taxpayer income |
|
3-21 |
level or size of business. |
|
3-22 |
     (c) The analyses under subsection (a) of this section shall, at a minimum: |
|
3-23 |
     (1) Present evidence as to whether or not the existence of the tax expenditure has |
|
3-24 |
contributed to the achievement of any or all of the purposes identified under subsection (b) of this |
|
3-25 |
section; |
|
3-26 |
     (2) Evaluate the tax expenditure's cost-effectiveness in achieving any or all of the |
|
3-27 |
purposes identified under subsection (b) of this section; |
|
3-28 |
     (3) Identify any unintended effects or beneficiaries of the tax expenditure that are useful |
|
3-29 |
in understanding the tax expenditure's overall value and cost-effectiveness; |
|
3-30 |
     (4) Evaluate the relationship and interactions of the tax expenditure with other tax |
|
3-31 |
expenditures or direct spending programs in the same or related budget function. |
|
3-32 |
     (d) In the case of tax expenditures that the office of revenue analysis determines to be |
|
3-33 |
intended to benefit this state's economy, the analyses under subsection (a) of this section shall, at |
|
3-34 |
a minimum, also address the following considerations: |
|
4-1 |
     (1) The extent to which the tax expenditure encouraged beneficial new behavior as |
|
4-2 |
opposed to subsidizing behavior that would have occurred regardless of the tax expenditure; |
|
4-3 |
     (2) Whether and to what extent the tax expenditure may have displaced existing in-state |
|
4-4 |
economic activity or harmed existing in-state businesses; |
|
4-5 |
     (3) The extent to which benefits of the tax expenditure flowed outside the state; |
|
4-6 |
     (4) The extent to which the economic impact of the tax expenditure remained in state, and |
|
4-7 |
the extent to which that in-state impact resulted in further in-state economic gains; |
|
4-8 |
     (5) The adverse economic impacts associated with other budgetary options that were |
|
4-9 |
foregone as a result of offering the tax expenditure. |
|
4-10 |
     (e) The analyses under subsection (a) of this section shall include specific |
|
4-11 |
recommendations to the legislature and the governor as to whether the tax expenditure should be |
|
4-12 |
continued without modification, modified, or terminated. Those recommendations shall take into |
|
4-13 |
consideration the following: |
|
4-14 |
     (1) The extent to which continuation of the tax expenditure in its current or modified |
|
4-15 |
form would contribute to any or all of the purposes identified under (b) of this section; |
|
4-16 |
     (2) Whether the tax expenditure could achieve any or all of the purposes identified under |
|
4-17 |
subsection (b) of this section in a more cost-effective manner if it were modified, and what those |
|
4-18 |
modifications would be; |
|
4-19 |
     (3) Whether the tax expenditure could be administered more efficiently or enforced more |
|
4-20 |
effectively if it were modified; |
|
4-21 |
     (4) Whether any or all of the purposes identified under subsection (b) of this section |
|
4-22 |
could be accomplished in a more cost-effective manner by an alternative policy; |
|
4-23 |
     (5) Whether the revenue foregone as a result of the tax expenditure is expected to change |
|
4-24 |
significantly in future years, and how that change might affect the tax expenditure's cost- |
|
4-25 |
effectiveness; |
|
4-26 |
     (6) Whether the social or economic benefits of the tax expenditure are expected to change |
|
4-27 |
significantly in future years, and how that change might affect the tax expenditure's cost- |
|
4-28 |
effectiveness; |
|
4-29 |
     (7) In the case of tax expenditures that the office of revenue analysis recommends for |
|
4-30 |
termination, whether that termination should be immediate, delayed, or phased-in gradually; |
|
4-31 |
     (8) In the case of tax expenditures where the analysis under subsection (a) of this section |
|
4-32 |
is significantly limited due to data constraints, whether any changes in statute would facilitate |
|
4-33 |
data collection in a way that would allow the office of revenue analysis to better gauge the extent |
|
4-34 |
to which the tax expenditure is achieving the purposes under subsection (b) of this section; |
|
5-1 |
     (9) In the case of tax expenditures where the analysis under subsection (a) of this section |
|
5-2 |
is significantly limited due to uncertainty of the purpose of the tax expenditure, whether the |
|
5-3 |
effectiveness of the tax expenditure could be determined more definitively if the legislature were |
|
5-4 |
to clarify the tax expenditure's intended purpose. |
|
5-5 |
     (f) To the extent that any of the analyses under subsection (a) of this section are |
|
5-6 |
significantly limited due to data constraints, the office of revenue analysis shall, in addition to any |
|
5-7 |
changes in statutes recommended under subsection (e) of this section, develop and publish with |
|
5-8 |
the analyses under subsection (a) of this section a plan for improving the government's data |
|
5-9 |
collection and compilation efforts in a way that will allow the office revenue analysis to conduct a |
|
5-10 |
full evaluation that can better gauge the extent to which the tax expenditure is achieving the |
|
5-11 |
purposes under subsection (b) of this section, and said expenditure shall be resubmitted for |
|
5-12 |
analysis under subsection (a) of this subsection the following year and every subsequent year |
|
5-13 |
until full evaluation can be made. Under no circumstances shall the tax expenditure go longer |
|
5-14 |
than seven (7) years without receiving a full evaluation under subsection (a) of this section. |
|
5-15 |
     (g) Pursuant to an analysis under subsection (a) of this section, the recipient of a tax |
|
5-16 |
expenditure shall: |
|
5-17 |
     (1) Provide promptly any information that the office of revenue analysis requests, so long |
|
5-18 |
as that request does not conflict with existing taxpayer confidentiality laws; |
|
5-19 |
     (2) Analyze data in the manner requested by the office of revenue analysis in instances |
|
5-20 |
where taxpayer confidentiality laws prevent the recipient of a tax expenditure from sharing |
|
5-21 |
information requested by the office of revenue analysis; |
|
5-22 |
     (3) Otherwise cooperate with the office of revenue analysis. |
|
5-23 |
     (h) Analyses under subsection (a) of this section must be submitted to the legislature and |
|
5-24 |
the governor, and made available on the evaluating body's public website no later than the date |
|
5-25 |
specified under subsection (a) of this section. |
|
5-26 |
     44-48.2-5. Consideration by the governor. -- The governor's budget submission as |
|
5-27 |
required under chapter 35-3 shall identify each tax expenditure for which an analysis was |
|
5-28 |
completed in accordance with this chapter in the period since the governor's previous budget |
|
5-29 |
submission in one separate budget article. For each tax expenditure, the governor's budget |
|
5-30 |
submission shall include a recommendation as to whether the tax expenditure should be |
|
5-31 |
continued without modification, modified, or terminated. Where the governor's recommendation |
|
5-32 |
differs from those made by the office of revenue analysis in accordance with this chapter, the |
|
5-33 |
budget submission shall provide the reasoning behind the governor's recommendation. |
|
6-34 |
     44-48.2-6. Legislative consideration. -- No later than the twentieth (20th) day of the first |
|
6-35 |
regular legislative session following the release of the analyses in accordance with this chapter, |
|
6-36 |
the house finance committee and the senate finance committee shall hold at least one public |
|
6-37 |
hearing to receive testimony regarding the tax expenditures analyzed in accordance with this |
|
6-38 |
chapter from the office of management and budget and the general public. |
|
6-39 |
     SECTION 2. This act shall take effect sixty (60) days after passage. |
|
      | |
|
======= | |
|
LC01323 | |
|
======= | |
|
EXPLANATION | |
|
BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL | |
|
OF | |
|
A N A C T | |
|
RELATING TO TAXATION -- TAX EXPENDITURE EVALUATION ACT | |
|
*** | |
|
7-1 |
     This act would impose a procedure for the analysis and evaluation of tax expenditures by |
|
7-2 |
the office of revenue analysis. |
|
7-3 |
     This act would take effect sixty (60) days after passage. |
|
      | |
|
======= | |
|
LC01323 | |
|
======= |